Imagine a sprawling corporate network where artificial intelligence systems hum tirelessly in the background, processing terabytes of sensitive data at lightning speed, often without a single human eye watching over them. This isn’t a sci-fi plot—it’s the reality for countless enterprises today.
Imagine a busy morning in Accra, where a young professional relies on a digital assistant to set reminders for meetings, send quick messages, and even navigate through the city’s bustling streets—all with a simple voice command or tap. Across the African continent, from Nairobi to Lagos, tools like
Imagine a world where every painting, poem, and personal conversation is crafted not by a human hand or heart, but by a machine—an artificial intelligence (AI) so advanced it mimics the very essence of what makes us unique. This isn’t science fiction anymore; it’s the reality unfolding before
Central question and scope: genuine care, covert surveillance, or a contested middle ground? In a moment when employers promise compassion at scale, the rise of AI that listens, counsels, and infers feelings poses a stark question that refuses to go away: does this technology genuinely care for
Audiences may chuckle at machine-written quips, but new evidence argues the laugh line hides a deeper gap between fluent mimicry and real comic sense, and that gap matters whenever meaning and nuance do the heavy lifting. A study presented at EMNLP by teams from Cardiff University and Ca’ Foscari
A Sharp Question At The Heart Of Malaysia’s AI Surge Malaysia captured 32 percent of Southeast Asia’s AI funding even as regional deal counts cratered to a fraction of their peak, and that paradox set up the most important tech question in the region: was this a durable shift in gravity or just the
